TITLE 11BANKRUPTCY
CHAPTER 5CREDITORS, THE DEBTOR, AND THE ESTATE
Sub Chapter II Debtor's Duties and Benefits
Sec. 523. Exceptions to discharge
(a) A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228(a), 1228(b), or
1328(b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any
debt--
(1) for a tax or a customs duty--
(A) of the kind and for the periods specified in section
507(a)(2) or 507(a)(8) of this title, whether or not a claim for
such tax was filed or allowed;
(B) with respect to which a return, if required--
(i) was not filed; or
(ii) was filed after the date on which such return was
last due, under applicable law or under any extension, and
after two years before the date of the filing of the
petition; or
(C) with respect to which the debtor made a fraudulent
return or willfully attempted in any manner to evade or defeat
such tax;
(2) for money, property, services, or an extension, renewal, or
refinancing of credit, to the extent obtained by--
(A) false pretenses, a false representation, or actual
fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor's or an
insider's financial condition;
(B) use of a statement in writing--
(i) that is materially false;
(ii) respecting the debtor's or an insider's financial
condition;
(iii) on which the creditor to whom the debtor is liable
for such money, property, services, or credit reasonably
relied; and
(iv) that the debtor caused to be made or published with
intent to deceive; or
(C) for purposes of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph,
consumer debts owed to a single creditor and aggregating more
than $1,000 for ``luxury goods or services'' incurred by an
individual debtor on or within 60 days before the order for
relief under this title, or cash advances aggregating more than
$1,000 that are extensions of consumer credit under an open end
credit plan obtained by an individual debtor on or within 60
days before the order for relief under this title, are presumed
to be nondischargeable; ``luxury goods or services'' do not
include goods or services reasonably acquired for the support or
maintenance of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor; an
extension of consumer credit under an open end credit plan is to
be defined for purposes of this subparagraph as it is defined in
the Consumer Credit Protection Act;
(3) neither listed nor scheduled under section 521(1) of this
title, with the name, if known to the debtor, of the creditor to
whom such debt is owed, in time to permit--
(A) if such debt is not of a kind specified in paragraph
(2), (4), or (6) of this subsection, timely filing of a proof of
claim, unless such creditor had notice or actual knowledge of
the case in time for such timely filing; or
(B) if such debt is of a kind specified in paragraph (2),
(4), or (6) of this subsection, timely filing of a proof of
claim and timely request for a determination of dischargeability
of such debt under one of such paragraphs, unless such creditor
had notice or actual knowledge of the case in time for such
timely filing and request;
(4) for fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary
capacity, embezzlement, or larceny;
(5) to a spouse, former spouse, or child of the debtor, for
alimony to, maintenance for, or support of such spouse or child, in
connection with a separation agreement, divorce decree or other
order of a court of record, determination made in accordance with
State or territorial law by a governmental unit, or property
settlement agreement, but not to the extent that--
(A) such debt is assigned to another entity, voluntarily, by
operation of law, or otherwise (other than debts assigned
pursuant to section 408(a)(3) of the Social Security Act, or any
such debt which has been assigned to the Federal Government or
to a State or any political subdivision of such State); or
(B) such debt includes a liability designated as alimony,
maintenance, or support, unless such liability is actually in
the nature of alimony, maintenance, or support;
(6) for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another
entity or to the property of another entity;
(7) to the extent such debt is for a fine, penalty, or
forfeiture payable to and for the benefit of a governmental unit,
and is not compensation for actual pecuniary loss, other than a tax
penalty--
(A) relating to a tax of a kind not specified in paragraph
(1) of this subsection; or
(B) imposed with respect to a transaction or event that
occurred before three years before the date of the filing of the
petition;
(8) for an educational benefit overpayment or loan made, insured
or guaranteed by a governmental unit, or made under any program
funded in whole or in part by a governmental unit or nonprofit
institution, or for an obligation to repay funds received as an
educational benefit, scholarship or stipend, unless excepting such
debt from discharge under this paragraph will impose an undue
hardship on the debtor and the debtor's dependents;
(9) for death or personal injury caused by the debtor's
operation of a motor vehicle if such operation was unlawful because
the debtor was intoxicated from using alcohol, a drug, or another
substance;
(10) that was or could have been listed or scheduled by the
debtor in a prior case concerning the debtor under this title or
under the Bankruptcy Act in which the debtor waived discharge, or
was denied a discharge under section 727(a)(2), (3), (4), (5), (6),
or (7) of this title, or under section 14c(1), (2), (3), (4), (6),
or (7) of such Act;
(11) provided in any final judgment, unreviewable order, or
consent order or decree entered in any court of the United States or
of any State, issued by a Federal depository institutions regulatory
agency, or contained in any settlement agreement entered into by the
debtor, arising from any act of fraud or defalcation while acting in
a fiduciary capacity committed with respect to any depository
institution or insured credit union;
(12) for malicious or reckless failure to fulfill any commitment
by the debtor to a Federal depository institutions regulatory agency
to maintain the capital of an insured depository institution, except
that this paragraph shall not extend any such commitment which would
otherwise be terminated due to any act of such agency;
(13) for any payment of an order of restitution issued under
title 18, United States Code;
(14) incurred to pay a tax to the United States that would be
nondischargeable pursuant to paragraph (1);
(15) not of the kind described in paragraph (5) that is incurred
by the debtor in the course of a divorce or separation or in
connection with a separation agreement, divorce decree or other
order of a court of record, a determination made in accordance with
State or territorial law by a governmental unit unless--
(A) the debtor does not have the ability to pay such debt
from income or property of the debtor not reasonably necessary
to be expended for the maintenance or support of the debtor or a
dependent of the debtor and, if the debtor is engaged in a
business, for the payment of expenditures necessary for the
continuation, preservation, and operation of such business; or
(B) discharging such debt would result in a benefit to the
debtor that outweighs the detrimental consequences to a spouse,
former spouse, or child of the debtor;
(16) for a fee or assessment that becomes due and payable after
the order for relief to a membership association with respect to the
debtor's interest in a dwelling unit that has condominium ownership
or in a share of a cooperative housing corporation, but only if such
fee or assessment is payable for a period during which--
(A) the debtor physically occupied a dwelling unit in the
condominium or cooperative project; or
(B) the debtor rented the dwelling unit to a tenant and
received payments from the tenant for such period,
but nothing in this paragraph shall except from discharge the debt
of a debtor for a membership association fee or assessment for a
period arising before entry of the order for relief in a pending or
subsequent bankruptcy case;
(17) for a fee imposed by a court for the filing of a case,
motion, complaint, or appeal, or for other costs and expenses
assessed with respect to such filing, regardless of an assertion of
poverty by the debtor under section 1915(b) or (f) of title 28, or
the debtor's status as a prisoner, as defined in section 1915(h) of
title 28; or
(18) owed under State law to a State or municipality that is--
(A) in the nature of support, and
(B) enforceable under part D of title IV of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a debt that was
excepted from discharge under subsection (a)(1), (a)(3), or (a)(8) of
this section, under section 17a(1), 17a(3), or 17a(5) of the Bankruptcy
Act, under section 439A \1\ of the Higher Education Act of 1965, or
under section 733(g) \1\ of the Public Health Service Act in a prior
case concerning the debtor under this title, or under the Bankruptcy
Act, is dischargeable in a case under this title unless, by the terms of
subsection (a) of this section, such debt is not dischargeable in the
case under this title.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See References in Text note below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c)(1) Except as provided in subsection (a)(3)(B) of this section,
the debtor shall be discharged from a debt of a kind specified in
paragraph (2), (4), (6), or (15) of subsection (a) of this section,
unless, on request of the creditor to whom such debt is owed, and after
notice and a hearing, the court determines such debt to be excepted from
discharge under paragraph (2), (4), (6), or (15), as the case may be, of
subsection (a) of this section.
(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of a Federal
depository institutions regulatory agency seeking, in its capacity as
conservator, receiver, or liquidating agent for an insured depository
institution, to recover a debt described in subsection (a)(2), (a)(4),
(a)(6), or (a)(11) owed to such institution by an institution-affiliated
party unless the receiver, conservator, or liquidating agent was
appointed in time to reasonably comply, or for a Federal depository
institutions regulatory agency acting in its corporate capacity as a
successor to such receiver, conservator, or liquidating agent to
reasonably comply, with subsection (a)(3)(B) as a creditor of such
institution-affiliated party with respect to such debt.
(d) If a creditor requests a determination of dischargeability of a
consumer debt under subsection (a)(2) of this section, and such debt is
discharged, the court shall grant judgment in favor of the debtor for
the costs of, and a reasonable attorney's fee for, the proceeding if the
court finds that the position of the creditor was not substantially
justified, except that the court shall not award such costs and fees if
special circumstances would make the award unjust.
(e) Any institution-affiliated party of a \2\ insured depository
institution shall be considered to be acting in a fiduciary capacity
with respect to the purposes of subsection (a)(4) or (11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ So in original. Probably should be ``an''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Pub. L. 95-598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2590; Pub. L. 96-56, Sec. 3,
Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 387; Pub. L. 97-35, title XXIII, Sec. 2334(b),
Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 863; Pub. L. 98-353, title III, Secs. 307, 371,
454, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 353, 364, 375; Pub. L. 99-554, title II,
Secs. 257(n), 281, 283(j), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3115-3117; Pub. L.
101-581, Sec. 2(a), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2865; Pub. L. 101-647,
title XXV, Sec. 2522(a), title XXXI, Sec. 3102(a), title XXXVI,
Sec. 3621, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4865, 4916, 4964; Pub. L. 103-322,
title XXXII, Sec. 320934, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2135; Pub. L. 103-
394, title II, Sec. 221, title III, Secs. 304(e), (h)(3), 306, 309,
title V, Sec. 501(d)(13), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4129, 4133-4135,
4137, 4145; Pub. L. 104-134, title I, Sec. 101[(a)] [title VIII,
Sec. 804(b)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321-74; renumbered title
I, Pub. L. 104-140, Sec. 1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327; Pub. L. 104-
193, title III, Sec. 374(a), Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2255; Pub. L. 105-
244, title IX, Sec. 971(a), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1837.)
Historical and Revision Notes
legislative statements
Section 523(a)(1) represents a compromise between the position taken
in the House bill and the Senate amendment. Section 523(a)(2) likewise
represents a compromise between the position taken in the House bill and
the Senate amendment with respect to the false financial statement
exception to discharge. In order to clarify that a ``renewal of credit''
includes a ``refinancing of credit'', explicit reference to a
refinancing of credit is made in the preamble to section 523(a)(2). A
renewal of credit or refinancing of credit that was obtained by a false
financial statement within the terms of section 523(a)(2) is
nondischargeable. However, each of the provisions of section 523(a)(2)
must be proved. Thus, under section 523(a)(2)(A) a creditor must prove
that the debt was obtained by false pretenses, a false representation,
or actual fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor's or an
insider's financial condition. Subparagraph (A) is intended to codify
current case law e.g., Neal v. Clark, 95 U.S. 704 (1887) [24 L. Ed.
586], which interprets ``fraud'' to mean actual or positive fraud rather
than fraud implied in law. Subparagraph (A) is mutually exclusive from
subparagraph (B). Subparagraph (B) pertains to the so-called false
financial statement. In order for the debt to be nondischargeable, the
creditor must prove that the debt was obtained by the use of a statement
in writing (i) that is materially false; (ii) respecting the debtor's or
an insider's financial condition; (iii) on which the creditor to whom
the debtor is liable for obtaining money, property, services, or credit
reasonably relied; (iv) that the debtor caused to be made or published
with intent to deceive. Section 523(a)(2)(B)(iv) is not intended to
change from present law since the statement that the debtor causes to be
made or published with the intent to deceive automatically includes a
statement that the debtor actually makes or publishes with an intent to
deceive. Section 523(a)(2)(B) is explained in the House report. Under
section 523(a)(2)(B)(i) a discharge is barred only as to that portion of
a loan with respect to which a false financial statement is materially
false.
In many cases, a creditor is required by state law to refinance
existing credit on which there has been no default. If the creditor does
not forfeit remedies or otherwise rely to his detriment on a false
financial statement with respect to existing credit, then an extension,
renewal, or refinancing of such credit is nondischargeable only to the
extent of the new money advanced; on the other hand, if an existing loan
is in default or the creditor otherwise reasonably relies to his
detriment on a false financial statement with regard to an existing
loan, then the entire debt is nondischargeable under section
523(a)(2)(B). This codifies the reasoning expressed by the second
circuit in In re Danns, 558 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1977).
Section 523(a)(3) of the House amendment is derived from the Senate
amendment. The provision is intended to overrule Birkett v. Columbia
Bank, 195 U.S. 345 (1904) [25 S.Ct. 38, 49 L.Ed. 231, 12 Am.Bankr.Rep.
691].
Section 523(a)(4) of the House amendment represents a compromise
between the House bill and the Senate amendment.
Section 523(a)(5) is a compromise between the House bill and the
Senate amendment. The provision excepts from discharge a debt owed to a
spouse, former spouse or child of the debtor, in connection with a
separation agreement, divorce decree, or property settlement agreement,
for alimony to, maintenance for, or support of such spouse or child but
not to the extent that the debt is assigned to another entity. If the
debtor has assumed an obligation of the debtor's spouse to a third party
in connection with a separation agreement, property settlement
agreement, or divorce proceeding, such debt is dischargeable to the
extent that payment of the debt by the debtor is not actually in the
nature of alimony, maintenance, or support of debtor's spouse, former
spouse, or child.
Section 523(a)(6) adopts the position taken in the House bill and
rejects the alternative suggested in the Senate amendment. The phrase
``willful and malicious injury'' covers a willful and malicious
conversion.
Section 523(a)(7) of the House amendment adopts the position taken
in the Senate amendment and rejects the position taken in the House
bill. A penalty relating to a tax cannot be nondischargeable unless the
tax itself is nondischargeable.
Section 523(a)(8) represents a compromise between the House bill and
the Senate amendment regarding educational loans. This provision is
broader than current law which is limited to federally insured loans.
Only educational loans owing to a governmental unit or a nonprofit
institution of higher education are made nondischargeable under this
paragraph.
Section 523(b) is new. The section represents a modification of
similar provisions contained in the House bill and the Senate amendment.
Section 523(c) of the House amendment adopts the position taken in
the Senate amendment.
Section 523(d) represents a compromise between the position taken in
the House bill and the Senate amendment on the issue of attorneys' fees
in false financial statement complaints to determine dischargeability.
The provision contained in the House bill permitting the court to award
damages is eliminated. The court must grant the debtor judgment or a
reasonable attorneys' fee unless the granting of judgment would be
clearly inequitable.
Nondischargeable debts: The House amendment retains the basic
categories of nondischargeable tax liabilities contained in both bills,
but restricts the time limits on certain nondischargeable taxes. Under
the amendment, nondischargeable taxes cover taxes entitled to priority
under section 507(a)(6) of title 11 and, in the case of individual
debtors under chapters 7, 11, or 13, tax liabilities with respect to
which no required return had been filed or as to which a late return had
been filed if the return became last due, including extensions, within 2
years before the date of the petition or became due after the petition
or as to which the debtor made a fraudulent return, entry or invoice or
fraudulently attempted to evade or defeat the tax.
In the case of individuals in liquidation under chapter 7 or in
reorganization under chapter 11 of title 11, section 1141(d)(2)
incorporates by reference the exceptions to discharge continued in
section 523. Different rules concerning the discharge of taxes where a
partnership or corporation reorganizes under chapter 11, apply under
section 1141.
The House amendment also deletes the reduction rule contained in
section 523(e) of the Senate amendment. Under that rule, the amount of
an otherwise nondischargeable tax liability would be reduced by the
amount which a governmental tax authority could have collected from the
debtor's estate if it had filed a timely claim against the estate but
which it did not collect because no such claim was filed. This provision
is deleted in order not to effectively compel a tax authority to file
claim against the estate in ``no asset'' cases, along with a
dischargeability petition. In no-asset cases, therefore, if the tax
authority is not potentially penalized by failing to file a claim, the
debtor in such cases will have a better opportunity to choose the
prepayment forum, bankruptcy court or the Tax Court, in which to
litigate his personal liability for a nondischargeable tax.
The House amendment also adopts the Senate amendment provision
limiting the nondischargeability of punitive tax penalties, that is,
penalties other than those which represent collection of a principal
amount of tax liability through the form of a ``penalty.'' Under the
House amendment, tax penalties which are basically punitive in nature
are to be nondischargeable only if the penalty is computed by reference
to a related tax liability which is nondischargeable or, if the amount
of the penalty is not computed by reference to a tax liability, the
transaction or event giving rise to the penalty occurred during the 3-
year period ending on the date of the petition.
senate report no. 95-989
This section specifies which of the debtor's debts are not
discharged in a bankruptcy case, and certain procedures for effectuating
the section. The provision in Bankruptcy Act Sec. 17c [section 35(c) of
former title 11] granting the bankruptcy courts jurisdiction to
determine dischargeability is deleted as unnecessary, in view of the
comprehensive grant of jurisdiction prescribed in proposed 28 U.S.C.
1334(b), which is adequate to cover the full jurisdiction that the
bankruptcy courts have today over dischargeability and related issues
under Bankruptcy Act Sec. 17c. The Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will
specify, as they do today, who may request determinations of
dischargeability, subject, of course, to proposed 11 U.S.C. 523(c), and
when such a request may be made. Proposed 11 U.S.C. 350, providing for
reopening of cases, provides one possible procedure for a determination
of dischargeability and related issues after a case is closed.
Subsection (a) lists nine kinds of debts excepted from discharge.
Taxes that are excepted from discharge are set forth in paragraph (1).
These include claims against the debtor which receive priority in the
second, third and sixth categories (Sec. 507(a)(3)(B) and (c) and (6)).
These categories include taxes for which the tax authority failed to
file a claim against the estate or filed its claim late. Whether or not
the taxing authority's claim is secured will also not affect the claim's
nondischargeability if the tax liability in question is otherwise
entitled to priority.
Also included in the nondischargeable debts are taxes for which the
debtor had not filed a required return as of the petition date, or for
which a return had been filed beyond its last permitted due date
(Sec. 523(a)(1)(B)). For this purpose, the date of the tax year to which
the return relates is immaterial. The late return rule applies, however,
only to the late returns filed within three years before the petition
was filed, and to late returns filed after the petition in title 11 was
filed. For this purpose, the taxable year in question need not be one or
more of the three years immediately preceding the filing of the
petition.
Tax claims with respect to which the debtor filed a fraudulent
return, entry or invoice, or fraudulently attempted to evade or defeat
any tax (Sec. 523(a)(1)(C)) are included. The date of the taxable year
with regard to which the fraud occurred is immaterial.
Also included are tax payments due under an agreement for deferred
payment of taxes, which a debtor had entered into with the Internal
Revenue Service (or State or local tax authority) before the filing of
the petition and which relate to a prepetition tax liability
(Sec. 523(a)(1)(D)) are also nondischargeable. This classification
applies only to tax claims which would have received priority under
section 507(a) if the taxpayer had filed a title 11 petition on the date
on which the deferred payment agreement was entered into. This rule also
applies only to installment payments which become due during and after
the commencement of the title 11 case. Payments which had become due
within one year before the filing of the petition receive sixth
priority, and will be nondischargeable under the general rule of section
523(a)(1)(A).
The above categories of nondischargeability apply to customs duties
as well as to taxes.
Paragraph (2) provides that as under Bankruptcy Act Sec. 17a(2)
[section 35(a)(2) of former title 11], a debt for obtaining money,
property, services, or a refinancing extension or renewal of credit by
false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, or by use of a
statement in writing respecting the debtor's financial condition that is
materially false, on which the creditor reasonably relied, and which the
debtor made or published with intent to deceive, is excepted from
discharge. This provision is modified only slightly from current section
17a(2). First, ``actual fraud'' is added as a ground for exception from
discharge. Second, the creditor must not only have relied on a false
statement in writing, but the reliance must have been reasonable. This
codifies case law construing present section 17a(2). Third, the phrase
``in any manner whatsoever'' that appears in current law after ``made or
published'' is deleted as unnecessary, the word ``published'' is used in
the same sense that it is used in defamation cases.
Unscheduled debts are excepted from discharge under paragraph (3).
The provision, derived from section 17a(3) [section 35(a)(3) of former
title 11], follows current law, but clarifies some uncertainties
generated by the case law construing 17a(3). The debt is excepted from
discharge if it was not scheduled in time to permit timely action by the
creditor to protect his rights, unless the creditor had notice or actual
knowledge of the case.
Paragraph (4) excepts debts for fraud incurred by the debtor while
acting in a fiduciary capacity or for defalcation, embezzlement, or
misappropriation.
Paragraph (5) provides that debts for willful and malicious
conversion or injury by the debtor to another entity or the property of
another entity are nondischargeable. Under this paragraph ``willful''
means deliberate or intentional. To the extent that Tinker v. Colwell,
139 U.S. 473 (1902), held that a less strict standard is intended, and
to the extent that other cases have relied on Tinker to apply a
``reckless disregard'' standard, they are overruled.
Paragraph (6) excepts from discharge debts to a spouse, former
spouse, or child of the debtor for alimony to, maintenance for, or
support of the spouse or child. This language, in combination with the
repeal of section 456(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 656(b))
by section 326 of the bill, will apply to make nondischargeable only
alimony, maintenance, or support owed directly to a spouse or dependent.
What constitutes alimony, maintenance, or support, will be determined
under the bankruptcy law, not State law. Thus, cases such as In re
Waller, 494 F.2d 447 (6th Cir. 1974), are overruled, and the result in
cases such as Fife v. Fife, 1 Utah 2d 281, 265 P.2d 642 (1952) is
followed. The proviso, however, makes nondischargeable any debts
resulting from an agreement by the debtor to hold the debtor's spouse
harmless on joint debts, to the extent that the agreement is in payment
of alimony, maintenance, or support of the spouse, as determined under
bankruptcy law considerations as to whether a particular agreement to
pay money to a spouse is actually alimony or a property settlement.
Paragraph (7) makes nondischargeable certain liabilities for
penalties including tax penalties if the underlying tax with respect to
which the penalty was imposed is also nondischargeable (sec. 523(a)(7)).
These latter liabilities cover those which, but are penal in nature, as
distinct from so-called ``pecuniary loss'' penalties which, in the case
of taxes, involve basically the collection of a tax under the label of a
``penalty.'' This provision differs from the bill as introduced, which
did not link the nondischarge of a tax penalty with the treatment of the
underlying tax. The amended provision reflects the existing position of
the Internal Revenue Service as to tax penalties imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code (Rev.Rul. 68-574, 1968-2 C.B. 595).
Paragraph (8) follows generally current law and excerpts from
discharge student loans until such loans have been due and owing for
five years. Such loans include direct student loans as well as insured
and guaranteed loans. This provision is intended to be self-executing
and the lender or institution is not required to file a complaint to
determine the nondischargeability of any student loan.
Paragraph (9) excepts from discharge debts that the debtor owed
before a previous bankruptcy case concerning the debtor in which the
debtor was denied a discharge other than on the basis of the six-year
bar.
Subsection (b) of this section permits discharge in a bankruptcy
case of an unscheduled debt from a prior case. This provision is carried
over from Bankruptcy Act Sec. 17b [section 35(b) of former title 11].
The result dictated by the subsection would probably not be different if
the subsection were not included. It is included nevertheless for
clarity.
Subsection (c) requires a creditor who is owed a debt that may be
excepted from discharge under paragraph (2), (4), or (5), (false
statements, defalcation or larceny misappropriation, or willful and
malicious injury) to initiate proceedings in the bankruptcy court for an
exception to discharge. If the creditor does not act, the debt is
discharged. This provision does not change current law.
Subsection (d) is new. It provides protection to a consumer debtor
that dealt honestly with a creditor who sought to have a debt excepted
from discharge on the ground of falsity in the incurring of the debt.
The debtor may be awarded costs and a reasonable attorney's fee for the
proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt under subsection
(a)(2), if the court finds that the proceeding was frivolous or not
brought by its creditor in good faith.
The purpose of the provision is to discourage creditors from
initiating proceedings to obtaining a false financial statement
exception to discharge in the hope of obtaining a settlement from an
honest debtor anxious to save attorney's fees. Such practices impair the
debtor's fresh start and are contrary to the spirit of the bankruptcy
laws.
house report no. 95-595
Subsection (a) lists eight kinds of debts excepted from discharge.
Taxes that are entitled to priority are excepted from discharge under
paragraph (1). In addition, taxes with respect to which the debtor made
a fraudulent return or willfully attempted to evade or defeat, or with
respect to which a return (if required) was not filed or was not filed
after the due date and after one year before the bankruptcy case are
excepted from discharge. If the taxing authority's claim has been
disallowed, then it would be barred by the more modern rules of
collateral estoppel from reasserting that claim against the debtor after
the case was closed. See Plumb, The Tax Recommendations of the
Commission on the Bankruptcy Laws: Tax Procedures, 88 Harv.L.Rev. 1360,
1388 (1975).
As under Bankruptcy Act Sec. 17a(2) [section 35(a)(2) of former
title 11], debt for obtaining money, property, services, or an extension
or renewal of credit by false pretenses, a false representation, or
actual fraud, or by use of a statement in writing respecting the
debtor's financial condition that is materially false, on which the
creditor reasonably relied, and that the debtor made or published with
intent to deceive, is excepted from discharge. This provision is
modified only slightly from current section 17a(2). First, ``actual
fraud'' is added as a grounds for exception from discharge. Second, the
creditor must not only have relied on a false statement in writing, the
reliance must have been reasonable. This codifies case law construing
this provision. Third, the phrase ``in any manner whatsoever'' that
appears in current law after ``made or published'' is deleted as
unnecessary. The word ``published'' is used in the same sense that it is
used in slander actions.
Unscheduled debts are excepted from discharge under paragraph (3).
The provision, derived from section 17a(3) [section 35(a)(3) of former
title 11], follows current law, but clarifies some uncertainties
generated by the case law construing 17a(3). The debt is excepted from
discharge if it was not scheduled in time to permit timely action by the
creditor to protect his rights, unless the creditor had notice or actual
knowledge of the case.
Paragraph (4) excepts debts for embezzlement or larceny. The
deletion of willful and malicious conversion from Sec. 17a(2) of the
Bankruptcy Act [section 35(a)(2) of former title 11] is not intended to
effect a substantive change. The intent is to include in the category of
non-dischargeable debts a conversion under which the debtor willfully
and maliciously intends to borrow property for a short period of time
with no intent to inflict injury but on which injury is in fact
inflicted.
Paragraph (5) excepts from discharge debts to a spouse, former
spouse, or child of the debtor for alimony to, maintenance for, or
support of, the spouse or child. This language, in combination with the
repeal of section 456(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 656(b))
by section 327 of the bill, will apply to make nondischargeable only
alimony, maintenance, or support owed directly to a spouse or dependent.
See Hearings, pt. 2, at 942. What constitutes alimony, maintenance, or
support, will be determined under the bankruptcy laws, not State law.
Thus, cases such as In re Waller, 494 F.2d 447 (6th Cir. 1974);
Hearings, pt. 3, at 1308-10, are overruled, and the result in cases such
as Fife v. Fife, 1 Utah 2d 281, 265 P.2d 642 (1952) is followed. This
provision will, however, make nondischargeable any debts resulting from
an agreement by the debtor to hold the debtor's spouse harmless on joint
debts, to the extent that the agreement is in payment of alimony,
maintenance, or support of the spouse, as determined under bankruptcy
law considerations that are similar to considerations of whether a
particular agreement to pay money to a spouse is actually alimony or a
property settlement. See Hearings, pt. 3, at 1287-1290.
Paragraph (6) excepts debts for willful and malicious injury by the
debtor to another person or to the property of another person. Under
this paragraph, ``willful'' means deliberate or intentional. To the
extent that Tinker v. Colwell, 193 U.S. 473 (1902) [24 S.Ct. 505, 48
L.Ed. 754, 11 Am.Bankr.Rep. 568], held that a looser standard is
intended, and to the extent that other cases have relied on Tinker to
apply a ``reckless disregard'' standard, they are overruled.
Paragraph (7) excepts from discharge a debt for a fine, penalty, or
forfeiture payable to and for the benefit of a governmental unit, that
is not compensation for actual pecuniary loss.
Paragraph (8) [enacted as (9)] excepts from discharge debts that the
debtor owed before a previous bankruptcy case concerning the debtor in
which the debtor was denied a discharge other than on the basis of the
six-year bar.
Subsection (d) is new. It provides protection to a consumer debtor
that dealt honestly with a creditor who sought to have a debt excepted
from discharge on grounds of falsity in the incurring of the debt. The
debtor is entitled to costs of and a reasonable attorney's fee for the
proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt under subsection
(a)(2), if the creditor initiated the proceeding and the debt was
determined to be dischargeable. The court is permitted to award any
actual pecuniary loss that the debtor may have suffered as a result of
the proceeding (such as loss of a day's pay). The purpose of the
provision is to discourage creditors from initiating false financial
statement exception to discharge actions in the hopes of obtaining a
settlement from an honest debtor anxious to save attorney's fees. Such
practices impair the debtor's fresh start.
References in Text
The Consumer Credit Protection Act, referred to in subsec.
(a)(2)(C), is Pub. L. 90-321, May 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 146, as amended,
which is classified principally to chapter 41 (Sec. 1601 et seq.) of
Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to
the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of Title 15
and Tables.
The Bankruptcy Act, referred to in subsecs. (a)(10) and (b), is act
July 1, 1898, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544, as amended, which was classified
generally to former Title 11. Sections 14c and 17a of the Bankruptcy Act
were classified to sections 32(c) and 35(a) of former Title 11.
The Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(18)(B), is act
Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620, as amended. Part D of title IV of
the Act is classified generally to part D (Sec. 651 et seq.) of
subchapter IV of chapter 7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
Section 408(a)(3) of the Act is classified to section 608(a)(3) of Title
42. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section
1305 of Title 42 and Tables.
Section 439A of the Higher Education Act of 1965, referred to in
subsec. (b), was classified to section 1087-3 of Title 20, Education,
and was repealed by Pub. L. 95-598, title III, Sec. 317, Nov. 6, 1978,
92 Stat. 2678.
Section 733(g) of the Public Health Service Act, referred to in
subsec. (b), was repealed by Pub. L. 95-598, title III, Sec. 327, Nov.
6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2679. A subsec. (g), containing similar provisions,
was added to section 733 by Pub. L. 97-35, title XXVII, Sec. 2730, Aug.
13, 1981, 95 Stat. 919. Section 733 was subsequently omitted in the
general revision of subchapter V of chapter 6A of Title 42, The Public
Health and Welfare, by Pub. L. 102-408, title I, Sec. 102, Oct. 13,
1992, 106 Stat. 1994. See section 292f(g) of Title 42.
Amendments
1998--Subsec. (a)(8). Pub. L. 105-244 substituted ``stipend,
unless'' for ``stipend, unless--'' and struck out ``(B)'' before
``excepting such debt'' and subpar. (A) which read as follows: ``such
loan, benefit, scholarship, or stipend overpayment first became due more
than 7 years (exclusive of any applicable suspension of the repayment
period) before the date of the filing of the petition; or''.
1996--Subsec. (a)(5)(A). Pub. L. 104-193, Sec. 374(a)(4),
substituted ``section 408(a)(3)'' for ``section 402(a)(26)''.
Subsec. (a)(17). Pub. L. 104-134 added par. (17).
Subsec. (a)(18). Pub. L. 104-193, Sec. 374(a)(1)-(3), added par.
(18).
1994--Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 501(d)(13)(A)(i),
substituted ``1141,'' for ``1141,,'' in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 304(h)(3), substituted
``507(a)(8)'' for ``507(a)(7)''.
Subsec. (a)(2)(C). Pub. L. 103-394, Secs. 306, 501(d)(13)(A)(ii),
substituted ``$1,000 for'' for ``$500 for'', ``60'' for ``forty'' after
``incurred by an individual debtor on or within'', and ``60'' for
``twenty'' after ``obtained by an individual debtor on or within'', and
struck out ``(15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)'' after ``Protection Act''.
Subsec. (a)(11). Pub. L. 103-322, Sec. 320934(1), struck out ``or''
after semicolon at end.
Subsec. (a)(12). Pub. L. 103-322, Sec. 320934(2), which directed the
substitution of ``; or'' for a period at end of par. (12), could not be
executed because a period did not appear at end.
Subsec. (a)(13). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 221(1), substituted semicolon
for period at end.
Pub. L. 103-322, Sec. 320934(3), added par. (13).
Subsec. (a)(14). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 221(2), added par. (14).
Subsec. (a)(15). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 304(e)[(1)], which directed
the amendment of this section by adding par. (15) ``at the end'' was
executed by adding par. (15) at the end of subsec. (a) to reflect the
probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (a)(16). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 309, added par. (16).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 501(d)(13)(B), struck out ``(20
U.S.C. 1087-3)'' after ``Act of 1965'' and ``(42 U.S.C. 294f)'' after
``Service Act''.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 304(e)(2), substituted ``(6),
or (15)'' for ``or (6)'' in two places.
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 103-394, Sec. 501(d)(13)(C), substituted
``insured depository institution'' for ``depository institution or
insured credit union''.
1990--Subsec. (a)(8). Pub. L. 101-647, Sec. 3621, substituted ``for
an educational benefit overpayment or loan made, insured or guaranteed
by a governmental unit, or made under any program funded in whole or in
part by a governmental unit or nonprofit institution, or for an
obligation to repay funds received as an educational benefit,
scholarship or stipend, unless'' for ``for an educational loan made,
insured, or guaranteed by a governmental unit, or made under any program
funded in whole or in part by a governmental unit or a nonprofit
institution, unless'' in introductory provisions and amended subpar. (A)
generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (A) read as follows: ``such loan
first became due before five years (exclusive of any applicable
suspension of the repayment period) before the date of the filing of the
petition; or''.
Subsec. (a)(9). Pub. L. 101-581 and Pub. L. 101-647, Sec. 3102(a),
identically amended par. (9) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (9)
read as follows: ``to any entity, to the extent that such debt arises
from a judgment or consent decree entered in a court of record against
the debtor wherein liability was incurred by such debtor as a result of
the debtor's operation of a motor vehicle while legally intoxicated
under the laws or regulations of any jurisdiction within the United
States or its territories wherein such motor vehicle was operated and
within which such liability was incurred; or''.
Subsec. (a)(11), (12). Pub. L. 101-647, Sec. 2522(a)(1), added pars.
(11) and (12).
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101-647, Sec. 2522(a)(3), designated existing
provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 101-647, Sec. 2522(a)(2), added subsec. (e).
1986--Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99-554, Sec. 257(n), inserted reference
to sections 1228(a) and 1228(b) of this title.
Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 99-554, Sec. 283(j)(1)(A), substituted
``507(a)(7)'' for ``507(a)(6)''.
Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 99-554, Sec. 281, struck out the comma after
``decree'' and inserted ``, determination made in accordance with State
or territorial law by a governmental unit,'' after ``record''.
Subsec. (a)(9), (10). Pub. L. 99-554, Sec. 283(j)(1)(B),
redesignated par. (9) relating to debts incurred by persons driving
while intoxicated, added by Pub. L. 98-353, as (10).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99-554, Sec. 283(j)(2), substituted ``Service''
for ``Services''.
1984--Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 454(a)(1), in provisions
preceding subpar. (A), struck out ``obtaining'' after ``for'', and
substituted ``refinancing of credit, to the extent obtained'' for
``refinance of credit,''.
Subsec. (a)(2)(A). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 307(a)(1), struck out ``or''
at end.
Subsec. (a)(2)(B). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 307(a)(2), inserted ``or''
at end.
Subsec. (a)(2)(B)(iii). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 454(a)(1)(A), struck
out ``obtaining'' before ``such''.
Subsec. (a)(2)(C). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 307(a)(3), added subpar.
(C).
Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 454(b)(1), inserted ``or other
order of a court of record'' after ``divorce decree,'' in provisions
preceding subpar. (A).
Subsec. (a)(5)(A). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 454(b)(2), inserted ``, or
any such debt which has been assigned to the Federal Government or to a
State or any political subdivision of such State''.
Subsec. (a)(8). Pub. L. 98-353, Secs. 371(1), 454(a)(2), struck out
``of higher education'' after ``a nonprofit institution of'' and struck
out ``or'' at end.
Subsec. (a)(9). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 371(2), added the par. (9)
relating to debts incurred by persons driving while intoxicated.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 454(c), inserted ``of a kind''
after ``debt''.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 98-353, Sec. 307(b), substituted ``the court
shall grant judgment in favor of the debtor for the costs of, and a
reasonable attorney's fee for, the proceeding if the court finds that
the position of the creditor was not substantially justified, except
that the court shall not award such costs and fees if special
circumstances would make the award unjust'' for ``the court shall grant
judgment against such creditor and in favor of the debtor for the costs
of, and a reasonable attorney's fee for, the proceeding to determine
dischargeability, unless such granting of judgment would be clearly
inequitable''.
1981--Subsec. (a)(5)(A). Pub. L. 97-35 substituted ``law, or
otherwise (other than debts assigned pursuant to section 402(a)(26) of
the Social Security Act);'' for ``law, or otherwise;''.
1979--Subsec. (a)(8). Pub. L. 96-56 substituted ``for an educational
loan made, insured, or guaranteed by a governmental unit, or made under
any program funded in whole or in part by a governmental unit or a
nonprofit institution of higher education'' for ``to a governmental
unit, or a nonprofit institution of higher education, for an educational
loan'' in the provisions preceding subpar. (A) and inserted ``(exclusive
of any applicable suspension of the repayment period)'' after ``before
five years'' in subpar. (A).
Effective Date of 1998 Amendment
Pub. L. 105-244, title IX, Sec. 971(b), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat.
1837, provided that: ``The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending
this section] shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under
title 11, United States Code, after the date of enactment of this Act
[Oct. 7, 1998].''
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Section 374(c) of Pub. L. 104-193 provided that: ``The amendments
made by this section [amending this section and section 656 of Title 42,
The Public Health and Welfare] shall apply only with respect to cases
commenced under title 11 of the United States Code after the date of the
enactment of this Act [Aug. 22, 1996].''
For provisions relating to effective date of title III of Pub. L.
104-193, see section 395(a)-(c) of Pub. L. 104-193, set out as a note
under section 654 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103-394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not
applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before Oct.
22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103-394, set out as a note under
section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1990 Amendments
Section 3104 of title XXXI of Pub. L. 101-647 provided that:
``(a) Effective Date.--This title and the amendments made by this
title [amending this section and section 1328 of this title and enacting
provisions set out as a note under section 101 of this title] shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1990].
``(b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this title
[amending this section and section 1328 of this title] shall not apply
with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code
before the date of the enactment of this Act.''
Amendment by section 3621 of Pub. L. 101-647 effective 180 days
after Nov. 29, 1990, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101-647, set out as an
Effective Date note under section 3001 of Title 28, Judiciary and
Judicial Procedure.
Section 4 of Pub. L. 101-581 provided that:
``(a) Effective Date.--This Act and the amendments made by this Act
[amending this section and section 1328 of this title and enacting
provisions set out as a note under section 101 of this title] shall take
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 15, 1990].
``(b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this Act
[amending this section and section 1328 of this title] shall not apply
with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code
before the date of the enactment of this Act.''
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Amendment by section 257 of Pub. L. 99-554 effective 30 days after
Oct. 27, 1986, but not applicable to cases commenced under this title
before that date, see section 302(a), (c)(1) of Pub. L. 99-554, set out
as a note under section 581 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial
Procedure.
Amendment by sections 281 and 283 of Pub. L. 99-554 effective 30
days after Oct. 27, 1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99-554.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98-353 effective with respect to cases filed 90
days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98-353, set out
as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1981 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97-35 effective Aug. 13, 1981, see section
2334(c) of Pub. L. 97-35, set out as a note under section 656 of Title
42, The Public Health and Welfare.
Adjustment of Dollar Amounts
For adjustment of dollar amounts specified in subsec. (a)(2)(C) of
this section by the Judicial Conference of the United States, effective
Apr. 1, 1998, see note set out under section 104 of this title.
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in sections 101, 104, 106, 502, 507,
522, 524, 727, 1141, 1228, 1328 of this title; title 20 section 1087;
title 26 sections 6327, 7437.
|